![]() |
Action
Briefing |
|
|
|
|
The Newsletter of |
A lesson for parents: 4 x 4 = dirty + dangerous
Birmingham Friends of the Earth teamed up with the Alliance Against Urban 4x4s on Tuesday 11th January 2005 for a protest against urban four-wheel drive (4x4) vehicles.
Head Teachers' in traditional mortar boards and gowns distributed 'could do better' report cards to 4x4 drivers outside Edgbaston High School on Westbourne Road, Edgbaston, while 'lollipop ladies' remind parents of the threat urban 4x4s pose to children's safety and the environment. Our action coincided with an event in North London where protesters targeted a busy junction that becomes snarled up and dangerous during the early morning school run. Similar actions took place in Manchester and Nottingham.
The Alliance, made up of members of the Green Party, Friends of the Earth, Transport 2000 and other groups, hit the headlines last year when campaigners issued fake parking tickets to urban 4x4 drivers across the country for their poor choice of vehicle.
Hazard
The daily school run epitomises
the problems large 4x4s cause in cities and suburbs. At the school gates their
height and bulk makes them a hazard to cyclists, other motorists and pedestrians,
particularly children. Kevin Clinton, head of road safety for the Royal Society
for the Prevention of Accidents, has described 4x4s as "totally unsuitable
for the school run".
Unfortunately, the message isn't getting through. Last year, sales of 4x4s grew by 12.8 per cent to 179,439, more than double the number sold a decade ago. More than a fifth of these were purchased in the Greater London area and only five per cent are expected to ever be taken off-road by their owners. Worryingly, manufacturers also reported a fall in demand for small, fuel-efficient vehicles.
Driving a 13mpg 4x4 rather than a 25mpg car for a year wastes more energy than leaving a fridge door open for seven years. That's urban mpg, not combined mpg, as our protest was directed specifically at the irresponsible use by city dwellers of 4x4 vehicles in the urban environment, the school run in this instance. A quick look at urban mpg figures at www.landrover.com/gb/en shows 4x4s such as the Range Rover V8 4.4 (12.7mpg) and the Discovery V8 petrol (13.5mpg) to be ill-designed for urban motoring. The Freelander TD4 diesel (manual) has an urban mpg of 31.0, which is better than many models, but if you want fuel efficiency you could try the MG Rover ZR TD (urban mpg 39.2) for a start. Friends of the Earth is calling for Chancellor Gordon Brown to make Vehicle Excise Duty cheaper for smaller, cleaner cars, and more expensive for larger, more polluting ones.
If you are concerned
about road safety, take an advanced driving course, don't get a 4x4. Churchill
Insurance reported last year that urban 4x4s are involved in 25 per cent more
accidents than saloon cars and do far more damage. Of the top ten cars tested
since 1998 by the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro-NCAP), none is
a 4x4 and only three off-roaders make it into the top twenty. In Euro-NCAPs
pedestrian safety crash tests large 4x4s achieve an average score of 4 out of
36, compared with 10 and 13 for large and small family cars, respectively. Manufacturers
are responding to these concerns (the new Skoda Octavia and Honda CR-V CTDi,
for example) but the fact remains that these vehicles belong off-road, not on
the school run.
For more information about the Alliance Against Urban 4x4s visit www.stopurban4x4s.org.uk.
James Botham